Desktop view seems to have now gone. Clicking on the link for it doesn't appear to do anything. Yet another example of changing the system for the worse.

Thanks Michelle and all others. Justin from Support has already been in touch.

Just for further information, I had 7 auction lots close last night (listed a week ago). All sold and appear in the Sold list in MP, but none appeared in the Needs Attention list (being out of stock).

No, they are currently active, not closing until later this week, some/most already have bids on them, and I don't use the FPO option.

Yes, the tabs are like that. I clicked on the blue Clear Search button to make sure, and I got the All list of supposedly 34 items, but the true number is in excess of 50.

Thanks Gary I must have been lucky the first few times I did this so that the listing went live basically immediately.

Thanks Callum I have created a shipping template and it works for me. It was the "Combine with another purchase" option in the template  that solved the problem. It doesn't answer the question (and I don't expect you to be able to) as to why the shipping options for Buy Now are different to those for Auctions.

Callum I think you will see, as of today (29 April), the Specify shipping costs function has gone, and is replaced with an inflexible mechanism which doesn't recognise the possibility of combined postage - see screenshot. If you attempt a second option of $0, you get an error message saying the shipping options have to be unique. Yes, you can use My Products and set up a $0 (if purchased with item of similar postage) for now, but it is really set up for businesses, not casual sellers. TM seems to have forgotten that not everything sold on it is a package that needs a courier. Some of us act...

AJ echoes my concern. In the previous post from S with the various quotes from TM, the underlined section "unless you and the buyer agree otherwise" I feel is  (or should be) significant. Where the selling conditions state that "standard post is at buyer's risk" and the person goes ahead with the purchase under those conditions, are they not agreeing to those conditions and forming a "contract" where the buyer assumes the risk for NZPost losing the letter (and letters, not parcels, is all I have ever been asking about).

OK, this most recent message changes things considerably - my "buyer's risk" statement is valid.